Comentarios en: Las víctimas del caso Madoff http://dineroexperto.com/blog/las-victimas-del-caso-madoff/ El blog que te ayuda en tus decisiones financieras Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:47:57 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 Por: El caso Madoff: Las motivaciones no económicas de un fraude - BlogEconomista http://dineroexperto.com/blog/las-victimas-del-caso-madoff/#comment-1110 El caso Madoff: Las motivaciones no económicas de un fraude - BlogEconomista Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:32:39 +0000 http://dineroexperto.com/blog/?p=154#comment-1110 [...] Asia, Europa donde quiera que haya un inversionista, Madoff, estaba ahí y quien iba a dudar de un prestigio avalado por los años. Que uno de los [...] [...] Asia, Europa donde quiera que haya un inversionista, Madoff, estaba ahí y quien iba a dudar de un prestigio avalado por los años. Que uno de los [...]

]]> Por: Caso Madoff http://dineroexperto.com/blog/las-victimas-del-caso-madoff/#comment-975 Caso Madoff Sat, 20 Dec 2008 00:33:24 +0000 http://dineroexperto.com/blog/?p=154#comment-975 Impresionante la lista, la verdad es que resulta casi increíble, porque no son precisamente novatos ni inexpertos los estafados. Impresionante la lista, la verdad es que resulta casi increíble, porque no son precisamente novatos ni inexpertos los estafados.

]]> Por: Sean Bellew http://dineroexperto.com/blog/las-victimas-del-caso-madoff/#comment-955 Sean Bellew Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:38:03 +0000 http://dineroexperto.com/blog/?p=154#comment-955 I should be grateful if you could correct the erroneous assertion that Vincent Tchenguiz has a possible loss of $61m as a result of Bernard Madoff’s alleged activities. This figure is incorrect on a number of levels and is being picked up from your website and repeated elsewhere. Mr Tchenguiz has no direct exposure to the alleged Madoff scam. Elsina Ltd, whose ultimate beneficial owner is the Tchenguiz Family Trust, which is advised by Vincent Tchenguiz’s Consensus Business Group, has a 29.9% holding in Bramdean Alternatives Ltd (“Bramdean”. You list Bramdean’s possible loss separately and you are therefore double counting. Bramdean announced on Friday 12th December that it “has two holdings that maintain trading accounts with Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC ("Madoff"), Defender Ltd. and Rye Select Broad Market XL Portfolio Ltd., representing approximately 9.5% of” Bramdean’s net asset value as at 31st October 2008 (US$220,245,659). Therefore Elsina Ltd is, arguably exposed to 29.9% of 9.5% of US$220,245,659 – which is $6,256,077. However, as one invests in the shares of a company, not in its net asset value, even this calculation is spurious. Please amend your table accordingly. I should be grateful if you could correct the erroneous assertion that Vincent Tchenguiz has a possible loss of $61m as a result of Bernard Madoff’s alleged activities. This figure is incorrect on a number of levels and is being picked up from your website and repeated elsewhere.

Mr Tchenguiz has no direct exposure to the alleged Madoff scam. Elsina Ltd, whose ultimate beneficial owner is the Tchenguiz Family Trust, which is advised by Vincent Tchenguiz’s Consensus Business Group, has a 29.9% holding in Bramdean Alternatives Ltd (“Bramdean”. You list Bramdean’s possible loss separately and you are therefore double counting.

Bramdean announced on Friday 12th December that it “has two holdings that maintain trading accounts with Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC (“Madoff”), Defender Ltd. and Rye Select Broad Market XL Portfolio Ltd., representing approximately 9.5% of” Bramdean’s net asset value as at 31st October 2008 (US$220,245,659).

Therefore Elsina Ltd is, arguably exposed to 29.9% of 9.5% of US$220,245,659 – which is $6,256,077. However, as one invests in the shares of a company, not in its net asset value, even this calculation is spurious.

Please amend your table accordingly.

]]>